
What Google, Stripe, and Basecamp Get Right About Team Events
Google has a campus with free gourmet meals, nap pods, and an actual bowling alley. Stripe runs lean, with an intense work culture and a famous $10,000 "de-location" bonus for employees who move away from expensive cities. Basecamp has a 40-hour work week, no venture capital, and a fully remote team of about 70 people.
These three companies agree on almost nothing about how to run a business. But they all invest heavily in getting their teams together in person for shared experiences. The way they do it is different. The why behind it is identical.
Google: food as social infrastructure
Google's legendary free meals aren't a perk. They're a strategy. When Sergey Brin and Larry Page set up the original Mountain View campus, they placed cafeterias centrally and deliberately limited the distance between any desk and the nearest food. The goal was to create "casual collisions," unplanned encounters between people from different teams who wouldn't otherwise cross paths.
It worked. Google's internal research showed that employees who regularly ate in the cafeterias (as opposed to eating at their desks or off-campus) were measurably more connected across teams and more likely to collaborate on cross-functional projects.
But the cafeterias are just the baseline. Google also funds team dinners, off-sites, and quarterly outings at the team level. Managers have discretionary budgets specifically for social events. The company treats team bonding as infrastructure, not as a nice-to-have that gets cut when budgets tighten.
Google's People Operations team found that the highest-performing teams weren't the ones with the best engineers. They were the ones with the highest psychological safety, which correlated strongly with frequency of shared meals and social activities.
The lesson isn't "spend like Google." Most companies can't. The lesson is that Google, with all its data and all its researchers, concluded that shared social experiences are worth significant investment. If the most data-driven company in the world is spending real money on team lunches, maybe the rest of us should pay attention.
Stripe: intentional gatherings for remote teams
Stripe went remote-friendly early and expanded it during 2020. With employees across dozens of countries, the company faced a real challenge. How do you build team cohesion when people might never share a physical space?
Their answer was concentrated, intentional gatherings. Stripe brings teams together for multi-day off-sites several times a year. These aren't conferences with keynotes and breakout sessions. They're working sessions mixed with long group meals, walks, and unstructured time.
A former Stripe engineer described one of these gatherings to me. "The agenda had maybe four hours of actual meetings spread across three days. The rest was dinners, a group cooking class, walking around the neighborhood, and just hanging out in the hotel lobby talking. I learned more about my teammates in those three days than I had in six months of Slack."
We'd fly 15 people to one city for three days. The structured work took half a day. The rest was meals and conversations. It sounds wasteful until you see how much better the team works for the next three months.
Stripe's approach is expensive on a per-event basis. Flying people internationally, hotels, meals, activities. But the company views it as cheaper than the alternative, which is a distributed team that doesn't trust each other and communicates poorly. The cost of a quarterly off-site is a fraction of the cost of miscommunication, duplicated work, and turnover that comes from a disconnected team.
Basecamp: small, simple, consistent
Basecamp (the company behind the project management tool) takes a radically different approach. No VC funding, no massive budgets, no campus with amenities. The company is fully remote with about 70 employees and has been profitable since its founding in 1999.
Twice a year, Basecamp flies the entire company to Chicago (where the company is technically headquartered, though nobody works from an office) for a week-long meetup. The schedule includes some presentations and planning, but the majority of the time is unstructured. Group dinners every night. Optional activities during the day. A lot of just being in the same city together.
What's notable about Basecamp's approach is how simple it is. No facilitators, no team building exercises, no elaborate programming. The company rents a block of hotel rooms, books some restaurants, and lets people figure out the rest. Co-founder Jason Fried has written about this philosophy. The meetup is valuable because of proximity, not programming.
per year, Basecamp's entire company meets in Chicago for a week of meals, conversations, and low-key activities
For a company of Basecamp's size, this works out to roughly $100,000-$150,000 per year for both meetups combined (flights, hotels, meals, activities for 70 people, twice). That's their entire team social budget, and they've been doing it for over 20 years. The consistency and simplicity is the point.
The common thread
These three companies operate at completely different scales with completely different philosophies. But the pattern is the same across all of them.
Shared meals are central, not peripheral. Google builds cafeterias. Stripe organizes group dinners. Basecamp books restaurants. Food is always the anchor.
Unstructured time is protected. All three companies deliberately leave gaps in schedules for conversations that don't have an agenda. The casual, unplanned moments are treated as valuable, not as wasted time.
And the investment is treated as essential. None of these companies would cut their team event budgets to save money any more than they'd cut their engineering budgets. It's a core operating expense, not a line item to trim during a down quarter.
You don't need Google's budget or Stripe's travel policy. The principle scales down perfectly. A 15-person team doing monthly lunches and one annual off-site is using the same playbook. The ingredients are shared food, unstructured time, and consistency.
What you can steal from each approach
From Google, take the idea of making meals routine and central. Don't wait for special occasions. Regular lunches, ideally weekly, build more culture than occasional big events.
From Stripe, take the idea of concentrated togetherness for remote teams. If your team is distributed, save your budget for multi-day in-person gatherings rather than spreading it thin across virtual happy hours that nobody enjoys.
From Basecamp, take the simplicity. You don't need a facilitator or an elaborate program. Book a restaurant, get people in the same room, and trust that adults who share a meal together will figure out how to have a good time.
Ready to plan your next team outing?
TeamOutings makes it easy to organize, vote, and book — all in one place.
Try TeamOutings FreeThe companies that do team events well aren't the ones that spend the most money. They're the ones that do it consistently, keep it simple, and treat shared time as a real investment in how well people work together. Google, Stripe, and Basecamp figured that out with very different resources and very different cultures. The playbook is there for anyone willing to follow it.