Why Remote Teams Need In-Person Outings More Than Anyone
I've been fully remote for almost four years now. I love it. No commute, flexible hours, pants optional on Fridays. But I'll admit something that most remote work advocates won't say out loud.
I have no idea what half my coworkers are like as actual humans.
I know their Slack personas. I know who uses too many exclamation points and who responds in terse one-liners that make me wonder if they're mad at me (they're not, probably). I know their meeting faces, frozen mid-sentence at least twice a week when their WiFi drops. But their sense of humor? Their energy in person? What they're like when they're not performing "work"? No clue.
And that gap matters more than most remote-first companies want to admit.
The research is pretty clear on this
A 2023 Microsoft study tracked collaboration patterns across 60,000 employees and found that remote work caused professional networks to become "more static and siloed." People talked to fewer people, mostly the same ones, and cross-team communication dropped significantly.
Buffer's annual State of Remote Work survey consistently finds that loneliness and difficulty collaborating are the top struggles remote workers report. Not distractions at home, not time zones. Loneliness.
of fully remote workers say they feel less connected to coworkers than when they worked in an office
None of this means remote work is bad. It means remote work is incomplete without intentional effort to create connection. And the most effective way to create that connection is still, annoyingly, getting people in the same room.
Virtual happy hours are not the answer
Let me be blunt about this. Zoom happy hours stopped being fun approximately three weeks into the pandemic, and they haven't gotten better since. Neither have virtual escape rooms, online trivia nights, or any other activity that asks adults to pretend they're enjoying a group hangout through a laptop screen.
I've organized dozens of these events. The attendance curve is brutal. First one, 80% of the team shows up, everyone's enthusiastic. Second one drops to 60%. By the fourth one, you're looking at 30% attendance and the same five people every time, plus the new hire who doesn't know they can say no yet.
The problem isn't the activities. It's the medium. Human bonding relies on cues that video calls strip away. Physical proximity, shared physical experiences, the unscripted moments between structured activities. You can't replicate the feeling of sitting next to someone at a long table, both reaching for the last breadstick, over Zoom.
Research from MIT's Human Dynamics Laboratory found that face-to-face interactions are up to 34 times more effective than email for building trust and rapport. Video calls fall somewhere in between, but much closer to email than in-person.
What works for distributed teams
The companies doing remote work well have figured out a cadence. Not daily office time, not weekly mandated "collaboration days." Something more like quarterly or biannual in-person gatherings, with real budget and real planning behind them.
GitLab, one of the largest fully remote companies in the world, flies their entire team to a single location once a year for a week-long company retreat. They've said publicly that it's one of their biggest expenses and one of their most important investments in culture.
You don't need to go that big. A 15-person remote team in Seattle I worked with started doing two-day quarterly meetups. Fly everyone in on a Tuesday, team dinner that night, full day of workshops and activities on Wednesday, optional hangout Thursday morning before people head home. Cost per quarter ran about $15,000 including flights and hotel. Their employee retention rate over the past 18 months hit 95%. In an industry averaging around 80%.
Making the case to leadership
If you're an HR manager or team lead trying to convince your CFO that flying the remote team to Denver for two days is worth it, here are the numbers that tend to work.
The average cost of replacing a single employee is 50-200% of their annual salary. For a software engineer making $150,000, that's $75,000 to $300,000 per departure, factoring in recruiting, onboarding, lost productivity, and institutional knowledge walking out the door.
A quarterly in-person gathering for a 20-person team might run $8,000-15,000 per event. If it prevents even one resignation per year, you're way ahead.
We did the math after our first team retreat. One prevented resignation pays for four years of quarterly meetups. It wasn't even close.
The moments that matter most aren't on the agenda
The most valuable thing about in-person gatherings isn't the workshop or the team building exercise or the presentation from the CEO. It's the conversations that happen around those things. The walk to the coffee shop between sessions. Dinner on the second night when everyone's finally relaxed. The airport bar conversation with someone from a completely different department.
Those moments create the trust and rapport that make remote collaboration actually work for the next three months. They're the reason someone gives a teammate the benefit of the doubt in a tense Slack thread instead of assuming the worst.
Ready to plan your next team outing?
TeamOutings makes it easy to organize, vote, and book — all in one place.
Try TeamOutings FreeRemote work is here to stay. I'm not arguing otherwise. But the companies that will thrive with distributed teams are the ones investing in regular, meaningful in-person time. Not as a contradiction of remote work, but as its essential complement.